The brands
BSolve IT Limited operates five web brands. They share a company, a director and a set of servers, and three of the five share a team as well. Five names, three routes in.
The directory
Each brand sells its own work under its own name. This page is a directory, not a shop front: the links go straight to the brand, and every one of them is a normal dofollow link.
Managed UK hosting
Managed UK hosting, domains and support. The platform every other brand in the group builds on.
Build and rebuild
Builds and rebuilds WordPress sites for UK businesses, and publishes the case studies with the numbers in them.
Design and search
Website design, SEO and AI visibility work for small businesses, with a daily news desk covering both.
Design and care
Website design and long-term WordPress care from Kettering, plus free developer tools like the CSS clamp generator.
Standards
The AI Discovery Files specification, a free checker, a free WordPress plugin, a verified directory and quarterly adoption research.
The routing
Most people arriving here are trying to work out who to email, and the honest answer is shorter than five names suggests. There are three routes in, not five, because three of the brands are three front doors onto the same team.
| What you need | Where to go |
|---|---|
| Hosting, domains, mailboxes, cloud servers, or moving a site you already have. | 365i |
| A new website, or a rebuild of the one you have. | Press Forge, 365i Web Design or McNeece Web Design |
| The AI Discovery Files specification, the verified directory, or the free checker. | AI Visibility |
If none of those fit, or the question is about the company itself rather than a service, the contact page here is the right place.
The structure
Two are genuinely distinct disciplines. The other three are marketing routes to the same team.
It is worth saying that plainly rather than letting five logos imply five offices.
Hosting, domains, mailboxes, Linux and cloud servers. It is the oldest brand, it dates from the same year the company was incorporated, and everything the others build ends up running on it. A build can be excellent and still lose to a slow server, so the platform comes first.
If you want a new site or a rebuild, approach whichever one you found and do not spend a minute choosing between them. Nothing about the job changes. What differs is emphasis and what each site publishes: Press Forge owns the client case studies this site draws its figures from, 365i Web Design does the search and AI-visibility analysis, and McNeece carries the director's surname and the long-term care work along with the free developer tools.
Three names for one team is a normal thing for a small company to do and an easy thing to be cynical about, so here is the reasoning without the gloss. Each name was acquired or started at a different point over two decades, each has its own history and its own ranking, and retiring two of them would throw away work that still brings people in. What we will not do is pretend they are separate agencies competing on merit. They are doors, and they open on the same room.
It publishes a specification, a conformance guide and a public directory, and it gives away the two things that make the standard usable: a WordPress plugin that writes all ten files and a checker that grades any site without an account. So the whole specification can be implemented by somebody who never pays us a penny. A specification maintained inside an agency site would not be credible, so it has its own domain. It does sell one thing, making the files for you, and that is a fee for the work rather than for the standard. Separately, AI Discovery Files are built into every website project the group does, whichever door you came through, so the specification is not a thing we sell back to our own clients.
The graph
Matching identifiers are the whole trick: get them wrong by a slash and you have declared two unrelated entities.
Until this rebuild, nothing connected the five sites in a form a search engine or an AI assistant could read. Five sites said different things about who ran them, and one of them still contradicts the public register on the founding date.
The fix is small and structural. This site carries all five as subOrganization on its
Organization node, anchored at a stable identifier. Each sibling carries the matching
parentOrganization pointing back at exactly that identifier.
You can read the graph on this page. It is in the page source as JSON-LD, it lists all five brands with their real URLs, and it is generated from the same data file that rendered the cards above, so the two cannot drift apart.
Where to go next
Or see what came out of it before you decide.